Nintendo Switch has always been this weird product I struggled to understand as a lifelong PC gamer. As a citizen of a country Nintendo pretends doesn't exist I have zero nostalgia about any of their popular franchises. I'm not sure if I ever met anyone who owned any original Nintendo console before. So it was absolutely logical that I found a reason to buy a Switch and see what the deal is.
Boom. It happened.
Before we talk about Switch, I have to get through the boring part of explaining who I am and where I come from. It matters because I'm not your average lifestyle blogger or a tech reviewer who spent half their childhood playing all Zelda games.
Before Switch, there was... nothing?
Until 1990s, the history of gaming in my country involved mostly 8-bit and 16-bit minicomputers, mostly Atari XE, Commodore 64 or Amiga. In the meantime Nintendo had decided that our market, as well as a few others on the 'wrong' side of the iron courtain, was not worth gracing with their official presence. As a result, Nintendo consoles weren't as easily available or affordable as in other European countries. If anyone in my area in the 1990s had a Game Boy, NES or SNES, they belonged to quite an elite club.
We were familiar with a significant chunk of Nintendo's portfolio thanks to Pegasus console and dozens of unlicensed cartridges that could be traded legally due to faulty copyright law. Importers of bootleg NES clones made better job at introducing Nintendo to us than Nintendo themselves.
I played Super Mario Bros, Contra, two Dizzy installments and dozens of other games from American and Japanese markets. Light guns for Pegasus were a thing, so I got to know Duck Hunt, Hogan's Alley and Wild Gunman. On the other hand though, I never had a chance to see any installment of Zelda, Earthbound, Pokémon or Castlevania. I had no idea there were more installments of Super Mario Bros beyond the very first one. For most of the time me and my friends were at the mercy of local sellers trading bootleg cartridges. We played whatever was available.
Fast forward to 2021 and Nintendo still maintains their presence in Poland via a third-party company based in Czechia that does bare minimum as company representative. Authorized repairs take time and are unjustifiably expensive, as the console has to be sent to a repair centre in Czechia. Switch interface has no Polish translation. I've never seen any marketing campaigns involving Nintendo consoles in my vicinity. At the same time, Sony and Microsoft have had official branches in Poland since forever. Their flagship titles were on every billboard I've seen on my way to work.
I have zero reasons to love Nintendo for anything. Their games were indeed part of my childhood, but I don't give Nintendo any credit for that. They missed the opportunity to enter our market when people still remembered bootleg NES clones and they keep pretending the part of Europe between Germany and Russia is a meteor crater. Therefore, I treated buying a Switch like a gamble, with a plan to resell it if I fail to find a compelling reason to keep using it.
Tl;dr: I still own a Switch with no plans of reselling it. I enjoy it despite its flaws. But my feelings towards Nintendo as a company didn't change much. Nintendo is an Apple of gaming, except they use underpowered hardware. Switch is essentially an overpriced 2017 smartphone.
Okay, so what is this thing?
To understand what Switch is, it makes sense to look at system specs and Nintendo history.
Nintendo has been selling consoles since 1970s, with NES released in 1983. Until 2017 they released seven generations of home and portable consoles, with Wii U and 3DS being the last generations before Switch.
Nintendo Switch, introduced in 2017, combined separate lines of stationary and portable consoles into a single form factor with an option to choose between docked and handheld mode. Nintendo Switch retains a lot of design features from earlier iterations, such as familiar button layout or the ability to use joycons as motion-based wireless controllers in a similar fashion to Wii Remotes.
Under the hood Nintendo Switch uses 4 ARM cores at 1.02 GHz, 256 nVidia Maxwell-based GPU cores and 4 GB of RAM. Somewhat decent for a system designed in mid 2010s. What differs Switch from a 2017 smartphone is that it has active cooling and highly specialized operating system that could be optimized to be more lightweight than any version of Android or iOS.
There is also Switch Lite which is purely portable, e.g. can't be plugged to a TV. I never found it compelling though. It makes sense to pay more for a fully-featured console and enjoy the ecosystem to the fullest.
I keep calling Switch a 2017 smartphone but I don't necessarily consider it sarcasm. It accurately describes what Switch actually is, effectively calibrating my expectations. I hold a similar view on Xbox and PlayStation - under the hood they are nothing else than custom-designed purpose-built PCs.
At the time of writing Nintendo Switch Pro is being rumored but I'm not willing to comment on a product that doesn't exist yet. Instead of rumored Switch Pro we got Switch OLED, which is same old Switch with minor improvements.
Nintendo Switch, good parts
There's quite a few of them. It's a very interesting piece of hardware that sits in a specific niche.
Portability and form factor is what make Nintendo Switch unique. The fact you can switch seamlessly between stationary and handheld mode is a great feature. But I'm more willing to praise Nintendo for the fact that Switch is a portable console at all.
Since the discontinuation of PS Vita there are no other competitors on this market except mobile devices. Steam Deck may be an interesting alternative once it gets released, but it's a completely different beast.
Buying a Switch you enter into a very specific ecosystem of games that have been perfected over many iterations on multiple hardware generations. Some of them are criminally addicting and surprisingly detailed for a low-spec platform. Almost all of them are designed to age relatively well. You won't understand twenty-somethings getting excited over cartoonish games for kids unless you join this camp yourself.
It boots within seconds and can be kept in sleep mode all the time. Picking it up takes seconds. That makes Switch great to be used often but in irregular intervals.
Touch screen, even though it feels cheap and it's useless for anything other than typing, is acceptably responsive and reliable.
Aaaand not so good parts
It's expensive to buy and not so affordable to own. Apart from hardware you also need a decently sized SD card. You probably want to sign up for Nintendo Switch Online subscription to get cloud saves and access to more games. For longer sessions in front of your TV you probably want to buy a Pro Controller. This is still a 2017 smartphone with a fancy form factor and no amount of marketing can make up for that. I agree there's a fundamental difference between a game console and a smartphone but I still don't think it's reasonable to put Switch in the same price range as some PlayStation or Xbox bundles.
Flagship titles are expensive. Cloud saves as well as some older games require a paid subscription. Indies, even though abundant, are a mixed bag. I'm writing this as a citizen of a country in central Europe, with product prices like in Western Europe and average wages like in Eastern Europe, hence my perspective might be a little skewed.
It's made by Nintendo, a Japanese company with specific values and foreign cultural code that heavily influences various decisions, from inability to craft multiple items in Animal Crossing: New Horizons (no Nintendo, inanimate virtual objects don't have 'souls') to completely ignoring some European markets throughout its history (but that we already established, right?). And just like every single corporation, Nintendo understands money as their only language. So, be ready to get frustrated over weird design quirks and have nobody to listen to you.
Also, why the heck does this whole 'amiibo' thing exist? How does Nintendo get away with locking additional game content behind physical items while other AAA game studios get heavily criticized for much less?
No ratings, download metrics or player reviews in Nintendo eShop. Visuals and descriptions on product pages are usually
bullsh written in marketing language that screams 'Buy me! I'm great!' rather than 'This what I have to offer, take it or leave it'. To effectively discover new games on this platform I have to rely on external sources. And some of these sources may be sponsored.
Some games are sluggish and laggy. I know many games are ported from other platforms, but in case of Nintendo Switch there's only one platform to target. It's not a PC or an Android device with millions of different hardware and OS combinations. Game studios deserve most of the criticism for that but Nintendo as a gatekeeper deserves its share too.
Nintendo flagship games often make offensively poor job at explaining themselves. Picked up Tetris 99 and you keep losing battle after battle? Good luck figuring out 'badges' or 't-spin factory' without googling, and yes, you will need to know those to have a chance to win games. Do you keep losing races in Mario Kart 8? Did you know your choice of vehicle, tyres and parachute isn't as cosmetic as it seems? Can you figure out how to disable 'smart' steering without looking for instructions? Discovering hidden chunks of knowledge is enjoyable as long as the game itself prompts us to look for them. Games that require googling to discover their full functionality are simply poorly designed.
Some Nintendo flagships run at 30fps in docked mode on a console that sends 60hz full HD signal to external displays. Yes Animal Crossing, I'm looking at you. Other games run at 1600x900 in TV mode and they still have performance issues - that's The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. I'd have forgiven this kind off issues to a third-party title. But we're discussing platform-exclusive flagships.
In case of indies, especially affordable ones, you never know what you get. You may be playing a game dedicated for the platform or a quick cashgrab ported from Android / iOS. This may be good or bad thing depending on the game.
No refunds and downloadable demo versions are scarce. It makes me think twice before paying full price for any digital game on this platform. Imagine Cyberpunk 2077 getting released on Switch.
Not all games are released physically. Sometimes it takes time before it happens at all. Additional paid content makes things even more complicated. Producing physical copies of Switch games is expensive.
Analog controls in joycons are so flat they're in fact digital input. Maybe that's a flaw, maybe a deliberate design, I don't know. Pro Controller marginally solves this problem but I disagree throwing money at a problem can be called a 'solution'.
No official support for wireless headphones except a few models that rely on their own proprietary adapters. And let me remind you we're talking about a console that has Bluetooth connectivity built-in. Okay, having a 3.5mm jack port in 2021 is a good call, but in that particular case I'd be okay to sacrifice audio quality for convenience.
Firmware update to v13.0.0 introduced limited support for Bluetooth headphones, but audio latency is noticeable. I tried three different headsets and all of them emit game audio with an audible lag, making the whole experience distracting. Your mileage may vary though.
Games that play well on other platforms may not play well on Switch for reasons completely unrelated to performance. I struggle to explain it well, but believe me, Switch can break a lot of interesting ideas solely by the way it's designed. It's a challenging task to design a game that plays well both in handheld and TV mode and that's what many indie studios seem to struggle with, especially when they port an existing title from other platforms. The term 'Switch sacrifice' was coined for a reason and there's more to it than subpar hardware specs.
Handheld mode is very unergonomic and inconvenient to use for long periods of time. If I play for too long, my hands get numb. Unplugging joycons and using them as a controller in tabletop mode? Poor workaround that introduces a new category of problems. Of course I can mod my Switch to be more ergonomic, but this is once again throwing money at a design flaw.
Very flat analog thumbs in joycons. It's hard to get a good grip on them. Pro Controller is a little better.
If you switch from an Xbox controller, thumb button layout is inverted and it takes time to develop muscle memory. Yes, it can be switched programmatically. Yes, Nintendo was the first and everybody else does it wrong. But many game tutorials use pictures to explain controls and I can't be sure if they follow my setting as well.
Pro Controller for Switch has two rows of small function buttons ('+' and '-', Home and screenshot) that lack any texture. It's hard to develop any muscle memory around them. If I drank every time I accidentally minimized a game with the 'Home' button I'd need a new liver.
Something something cost management
Buy physical copies, preferably used ones. Switch is still a fairly young ecosystem and second-hand game cards are in mint condition. Thanks to that you can always get some of your money back if you decide to resell games you don't like. Thank goodness, games aren't region-locked.
I don't know what to do with games with downloadable content that can be purchased digital only. In this case it's up to Nintendo to re-release those games, but that may happen next month, next year or (most likely) never. For now I try avoid digital purchases for as long as I can.
Think twice before buying any digital game because you won't have a chance to refund it. Wait for sales, they happen. Play demo versions if available. Use external sources such as Deku Deals to make informed decisions. Don't buy impulsively.
Get a decently-sized memory card and take responsibility for owning and archiving any game you buy digitally. This is not your Steam library and you won't transfer it between different hardware generations. Nintendo won't be maintaining Switch forever and their shop can't be trusted to be operational 100% of the time.
Games that play well on Switch
All Nintendo flagships. Well, you can't get them on any other platform and Nintendo needs a valid reason to overcharge you for a 2017 smartphone in a fancy form factor. Also, all those games are essentially sequels adapted to a current hardware iteration, which is both a good thing (you get a good product) and a bad thing (you get a product you've already seen on GameCube, 3DS or Wii, just with minor improvements).
Platformers, both 2D and 3D. 3D platformers are tricky, but they're still playable.
Games you would play on an arcade machine or your old NES. Technically Switch isn't an emulator but it offers a small selection of games from older generations as part of Nintendo Switch Online subscription.
Visual novels and story-driven games that require very little user input.
Slow games that don't require many actions in short periods of time. But that concept works on any platform.
Good ports of mobile games. I repeat, good, i.e. carefully tested and optimized. Switch offers similar performance to a mobile device plus controllers that can work miles better than touch controls. Also, mobile ports on Switch are less likely to pull sketchy schemes involving microtransactions or loot boxes.
Games without endgame. Stardew Valley, Animal Crossing: New Horizons and alikes. Part of the addictive nature of this kind of games is that Switch is a portable console and you can pick those games any time you want anywhere you want, whether lying on your bed or doing number 2.
Party and local multiplayer games, but that is something I haven't tested in a social setting. Joycons can be used as independent wireless controllers and this opens interesting design options.
Turn-based games. Again, the platform doesn't matter that much when you don't have to rush.
Games that are bad on Switch by definition
Ports of major PC games. I'll repeat, Switch is a 2017 smartphone with a proprietary operating system. Kudos to studios that successfully downgrade their flagship titles (Witcher 3), but buying them on an underpowered console is and always will be a gamble.
Any game you played on PC for longer than 4 hours. First, it's probably waste of money to buy it twice. Second, you'll probably have to relearn controls. Your mileage may vary though.
Majority of racing games. WRC 9 is playable, but very difficult without analog triggers, even with ABS and traction control on. Mario Kart 8 works well because its physics model is heavily assisted and the game requires specific skills that have little to do with racing. Any Need For Speed remaster will work fine because its physics is offensively simplistic. Asphalt 9, like a true mobile title of its era, has more to do with buying and colleting cards than racing. Grid Autosport is great and it even supports GameCube controller with analog triggers, but it's a fairly old game.
First person games. Okay, they are playable, but not as convenient as on PC. It's highly subjective though. If you come from Xbox or PlayStation and you're used to aiming and shooting with a controller rather than keyboard and mouse, you'll be fine. Switching from keyboard and mouse is painful though.
Games that involve precise aiming. Not only shooters. Games like Portal, QUBE or more advanced strategies are playable but quite challenging to play compared to their PC versions. The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild utilizes controller gyroscope for motion-based aiming, but many other games don't bother.
Games that require managing multiple entities in a single view. Many Switch games are good because they're cleverly designed to limit the amount of presented information. Complex games, like strategies or simulators, even if playable, will not be convenient on this platform.
So, should I buy a Switch?
Yes and no.
If you like popular Nintendo franchises like Mario, The Legend of Zelda or Pokémon, or you want to catch up with them, definitely yes.
If you like anime or Japanese RPG games... oh come on, you've been owning a Switch for a while and you're reading this for fun, no?
If you don't mind buying an underpowered piece of hardware produced by an eccentric Japanese company that doesn't differ that much from popular AAA game studios (in many cases it's even worse than them), probably yes.
If you want a portable gaming device that is not a smartphone, maybe. Steam Deck, despite being way more expensive, might be a worthy option to consider.
If you have children and you would like to introduce them to a safe and easy to use gaming ecosystem that will last for years, probably yes.
If you have friends that have a Switch, definitely yes. If you have no friends at all, upgrade your PC.
If you ever owned a Nintendo console or its clone, probably yes. Even just for nostalgia trips.
If you play on PC and you don't fall into any of the categories mentioned above, probably no.
If you don't have any other gaming hardware but you have a TV or a computer display, absolutely not. Get a PlayStation or an Xbox instead.
If you have no better idea what to do with your money, get an iPhone or a mechanical wristwatch.
Be aware that it's probably not a smart idea to buy a Switch until Nintendo releases Switch Pro. A lot of questions about fragmentation and compatibility are still open since the difference in specs will be huge. It's probably worth waiting until the current generation of Switch starts to be called last gen to pull a trigger. Or get a second-hand one from an unsatisfiable whiner like me. As of January 2022 there's still no information on anything called 'Switch Pro'. Instead, Nintendo released Switch OLED.